当前位置:首页 >> 幼儿读物 >>

051104


Updated version: January 18, 2007

The Minto Pyramid Principle
or the case for hierarchically structured thinking and communication...

The Proseminar Quadrology (2/4) http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/ Wolfgang Gatterbauer Vienna, November 4, 2005

Online available at: http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/staff/gatter/work/051104_The_Minto_Pyramid_Principle.pdf

Imagine you receive this letter from Lucy. What does she want to tell you?

A LETTER FROM A FRIEND (1/3)
Dear Shirley, Remember last Saturday afternoon when I was playing in the park with my boyfriend and you came over, and he told me that when my back was turned, you kissed him? And also, on Sunday when you came to my house and my Mom made you a tuna fish salad for lunch and you said: “Yech! That’s the worst salad I ever ate!”? And yesterday, when my cat brushed against your leg, you kicked her and threatened to sic your dog “Monster” on her? Well, for all of these reasons, I hate you, and I no longer want to be your friend. Lucy
Source: [Zel99], http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/

1

Wouldn‘t the message be far clearer if the letter were written that way?

A LETTER FROM A FRIEND (2/3)

Main statement or “governing thought” Dear Shirley, I HATE you. Here are my reasons: 1. You stole my boyfriend. 2. You insulted my mother. 3. You scared my cat. Reasons supporting the governing thought

Source: [Zel99], http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/

2

In the second letter, the hierarchy of Lucy‘s actual thoughts becomes more explicit and can be considered as a fictitious question-answer dialogue with the addressee.

A LETTER FROM A FRIEND (3/3)

Q: Why did Lucy write this letter to me?

A: Because ...

Lucy hates me.

Q: Why?

A: Because ...

I stole her boyfriend.

I insulted her mother.

I scared her cat.

Source: http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/

3

Any main statement can be either supported by an independent group of arguments ...

STAYING IN VIENNA (1/2) – INDUCTIVE LOGIC*

Mary should stay in Vienna.

Mary has a good job in Vienna.

Vienna has very good life quality**.

Mary’s friends all live in Vienna.

Independent group of answers (logical grouping)
* Induction [MW05]: inference of a generalized conclusion from particular instances. ** Vienna is the second best city to live in according to a 2005 survey from the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) on living quality in 127 cities of the world. Vancouver is ranked first. Source: http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/

4

... or by a chain of statements that together form a logical argument.

STAYING IN VIENNA (2/2) – DEDUCTIVE LOGIC*

Unless she is prepared to change, Mary has to stay in Vienna.

Mary wants to continue living in a large city.

Because she only speaks German, Mary is limited to Vienna, Zurich or a large city in Germany.

Mary dislikes Zurich and all German cities.

Therefore, if she wants to live in a large city and does not learn another language, Mary must stay in Vienna.

Chain of statements (logical argument)
* Deduction [MW05]: the deriving of a conclusion by reasoning. Syllogism [MW05]: deductive argument, consisting of a major and a minor premise and a conclusion. Source: http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/

5

In such a way, we can also answer the question about why we discuss this topic in class.

MOTIVATION OF THE TOPIC*

Q: Why do we discuss this strange stuff in class?

These topics are relevant for the overall course goals.

Q: Why?

One of the two course goals is preparation for scientific work.

The lecturer considers this topic to be highly relevant for scientific work.

Therefore, we talk about the pyramid principle in class.

Q: Why? ...
* Please also see remark 1 in the backup Source: http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/

...

6

Whenever you read or a write a scientific paper, first “distill” the key message, and then analyze or support it along a logical question-answering pyramid.

REMEMBER

Key message

First find or state the key message before you plunge into details. Ask questions before you give answers (even if it’s only in your mind). Envision the question-answering process to follow top-down a fictitious logical pyramid structure*.

Questions

Pyramid

* Please also see remark 2 in the backup Source: http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/

7

RELATED LITERATURE AND SOURCES
Many people consider Barbara Minto as the thought leader on logically structuring facts and ideas. She is especially well known for being the founder and author of The Minto Pyramid Principle. Student can order her book directly with her for a reduced price of 35 EUR (November 3, 2005): [Min96]: Barbara Minto. The Minto Pyramid Principle: Logic in Writing, Thinking, and Problem Solving. New and expanded ed, Minto International, 1996, ISBN: 0960191038. http://www.barbaraminto.com/book.htm (November 3, 2005). The example of Lucy writing to Shirley is taken from the following book with kind permission of Gene Zelazny: [Zel99]: Gene Zelazny. Say It with Presentations: How to Design and Deliver Successful Business Presentations. First edition, 1999, McGraw-Hill, ISBN: 0071354077. Definitions are taken from: [MW05]: Merriam-Webster OnLine. http://www.m-w.com/ (November 3, 2005). Thanks to Barbara Minto, Markus Gremmel and Gerhard Zehetner for useful comments and suggestions.
Source: http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/

8

Backup

9

REMARK 1 – TOP-DOWN VS. BOTTOM-UP
We made arguments for logically structuring your ideas top-down. Depending on the situation, it might make sense to actually present your reasoning bottomup. Take the example from slide 5 and imagine you try to convince Marry that she has to learn English if she does not want to stay the rest of her life in Vienna. When talking to her, you might want to start with the premises before stating the conclusion. Still, despite presenting your reasoning bottom-up, you would let the governing thought, top-down, “govern your own thinking” while constructing your argument. Draw the analogy to a (hypo)thesis in scientific research. You start with a problem, make a hypothesis and try to prove it. If it won’t work, you have to be honest to yourself and change the hypothesis. On the other hand, great breakthroughs in science and evolution tend to be bottom-up. Tim Berners-Lee might not have tried to prove the idea of the WWW when he first worked on his personal hypertext system ‘Enquire’ in 1980. But even in this case, he will have followed some idea, some dream, some end goal in mind, even if it was still not what it later turned out to be.

Source: http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/

10

REMARK 2 – POSSIBLE NAMING AMBIGUITY

Watch out for a possible naming ambiguity between the Minto Pyramid Principle and the inverse pyramid structure of writing. In journalism, the inverse pyramid structure (IPS) of writing refers to reporting a news story from the most important material to the least important, separating the statement of what happened from the specific detail of how and why it happened. This writing style contrast to the chronological style of fiction, in which a story is told in the sequential order in which events occurred. The main difference between the Minto Pyramid Principle and the IPS is that the former presents ideas and conclusions that rest on logical analysis and reasoning, whereas the latter is used to report facts in typical news writing style, starting with more and ending with less important information.

Source: http://education.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/wie/WS05/

11


相关文章:
专家分类
A051006 输变电-变电 A051007 输变电-土建 A05 监理 A051008 输变电-线路 A051101 A051102 A051103 A051104 A051105 A051106 A051107 A051201 A051202 A...
我适合哪类专家评分
051003 A051004 A051005 A051101 A051102 A051103 A051104 A051105 A051106 A051107 A051201 A051202 A051203 A051204 A051205 A051301 A051302 A051...
3-国发改专业标准
051003 A051004 A051005 A051101 A051102 A051103 A051104 A051105 A051106 A051107 A051201 A051202 A051203 A051204 A051205 A051301 A051302 A051...
华北水利水电学院水利职业学院
061108班 052102班 051104班 052012 班 水利工程系:051017 班 032013 班 042012 班 062011 班 052172 班 土木工程系:051021班 051024班 052023班 三....
评审专家信息登记表
A051003 输煤系统 A051004 热工控制 A051005 输变电 A0511 A051101 风能 6 A05 监理 新能 源工 程 A051102 太阳能 A051103 海洋能 A051104 生物质能 A...
河北省统一评标专家库专业分类列表
A051006 输变电-变电 A051007 输变电-土建 A05 监理 A051008 输变电-线路 A051101 A051102 A051103 A051104 A051105 A051106 A051107 A051201 A051202 A...
评标专家库分类
A051003 输煤系 A0510电力工程 统 A051004 热工控制 A051005输变电 A051101风能 A051102太阳能 A051103海洋能 A051104 生物质 A0511新能源工程 能 A051105...
江西省房屋建筑和市政基础设施工程综合评标专家库专业...
A051102 A051103 A051104 A051105 A051106 A051107 A060101 A060102 A060104 A060110 三级类别 土木工程 机电安装 系统设备、集成 通信与信息 风能 太阳能 ...
分部分项工程划分
051102 051103 051104 051105 051106 051107 051108 051109 051110 051111 051112 051113 051114 051115 051116 051117 ●●● 建筑电气安装工程分部(子分部)工...
国家发改委评标专家分类标准
A051003 输煤系统 A051004 热工控制 A051005 输变电 A051101 风能 A051102 太阳能 A051103 海洋能 备注 A0511 新能源工程 A051104 生物质能 A051105 地热能...
更多相关标签: