Designation: D 1475 – 98 (Reapproved 2003)
Standard Test Method For
Density of Liquid Coatings, Inks, and Related Products1
This standard is issued under the ?xed d
esignation D 1475; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval. This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
1. Scope 1.1 This test method covers the measurement of density of paints, inks, varnishes, lacquers, and components thereof, other than pigments, when in ?uid form. 1.2 For higher precision when working with nonpigmented materials (drying oils, varnishes, resins and related materials), Test Method D 1963 can be used to determine speci?c gravity and, thence, density. 1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only, 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. A speci?c precaution statement is given in 126.96.36.199. 2. Referenced Documents 2.1 ASTM Standards: 2 D 1193 Speci?cation for Reagent Water D 1963 Test Method for Speci?c Gravity of Drying Oils, Varnishes, Resins and Related Materials at 25/25°C D 4052 Test Method for Density and Relative Density of Liquids by Digital Density Meter E 180 Practice for Determining the Precision of ASTM Methods for Analysis and Testing of Industrial and Specialty Chemicals E 691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method 3. Terminology 3.1 De?nitions:
1 This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on Paint and Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D01.24 on Physical Properties of Liquid Paints and Paint Materials. Current edition approved Dec. 1, 2003. Published December 2003. Originally approved in 1957. Last previous edition approved in 1998 as D 1475 – 98. 2 For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at firstname.lastname@example.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
3.1.1 density—the mass of a unit volume of a material at a speci?ed temperature. In this method, it is expressed as the weight in grams per millilitre, or as the weight in pounds avoirdupois of one U. S. gallon, of the liquid at the speci?ed temperature; in the absence of other temperature speci?cation, 25°C is assumed. 3.1.2 speci?c gravity (relative density)—the ratio of the mass of a unit volume of a material at a stated temperature to the mass of the same volume of distilled water at the same temperature. 4. Summary of Test Method 4.1 The accurately known absolute density of distilled water at various temperatures (Table 1) is used to calibrate the volume of a container. The weight of the paint liquid contents of the same container at the standard temperature (25°C) or at an agreed-upon temperature is then determined and density of the contents calculated in terms of grams per millilitre, or pounds per gallon at the speci?ed temperature. 5. Signi?cance and Use 5.1 Density is weight per unit volume. It is a key property in the identi?cation, characterization, and quality control of a wide range of materials. Density measurements in terms of weight per gallon are commonly used to check paint quality. If the density is not within speci?cation, there is a good chance that there was a mischarge or other serious problem. 5.2 This test method is suitable for the determination of density of paint and related products and components when in liquid form. It is particularly applicable when the ?uid has too high a viscosity or when a component is too volatile for a density balance determination. 5.3 This test method provides for the maximum accuracy required for hiding power determinations. It is equally suitable for work in which less accuracy is required, by ignoring the directions for recalibration and consideration of temperature differentials, and using as the container a “weight-per-gallon” cup. 5.4 Automatic equipment for measuring density is available (see Test Method D 4052) from several manufacturers. Such apparatus has been used for resins and latices as well as for oils and solvents. Before such equipment is used for a given
Copyright ? ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Thu Aug 31 22:21:04 EDT 2006 Reproduction authorized per License Agreement with Peter L Ferguson (Fast Track Site Services);
D 1475 – 98 (2003)
TABLE 1 Absolute Density of Water, g/mL
°C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Density 0.999127 0.998971 0.998772 0.998623 0.998433 0.998231 0.998020 0.997798 0.997566 0.997324 0.997072 0.996811 0.996540 0.996260 0.995972 0.995684
product, results must be checked very carefully. Particularly with paints, inks, and resins, there are possibilities of gumming, fouling, and other interferences with operation. 6. Interferences 6.1 Highly viscous materials may entrap air and give erroneous low density values. 6.2 Paint or ink liquids may be trapped in the ground glass or metal joints of the pieces of apparatus and give erroneous, high density values. 7. Apparatus 7.1 Cup or Pycnometer—Any metal weight-per-gallon cup or glass pycnometer may be used, provided that it may be ?lled readily with a viscous liquid, adjusted to exact volume, covered to exclude loss of volatile matter, and readily cleaned.
NOTE 1—For materials that contain solvents that evaporate rapidly, a glass pycnometer of the weld type, with a narrow stopper and a cover should be used.
0.001 % of the weight of the container. Fingerprints on the container will change the weight and must be avoided. Record the weight, M, in grams. 188.8.131.52 Warning—Chromic acid cleaning solution is corrosive to skin, eyes and mucous membranes and can cause severe burns. Avoid contact with eyes, skin or clothing. In making dilute solution, always add acid to water with care. Chromic acid cleaning solution is a strong oxidizer. Avoid contact with organic or reducing substances as a ?re could results. See supplier’s Material Safety Data Sheet for further information. Other cleaners are much safer and may be equally effective. 8.1.2 Fill the container with reagent water conforming to Type II of Speci?cation D 1193 at a temperature somewhat below that speci?ed. Cap the container, leaving the over?ow ori?ce open. Immediately remove excess over?owed water or water held in depressions by wiping dry with absorbent material. Avoid occluding air bubbles in the container. 8.1.3 Bring the container and contents to the speci?ed temperature using the constant-temperature bath or room if necessary. This will cause further slight ?ow of water from the over?ow ori?ce due to the expansion of the water with the rise of the temperature. 8.1.4 Remove the excess over?ow by wiping carefully with absorbent material, avoiding wicking of water out of ori?ce, and immediately cap the over?ow tube where such has been provided. Dry the outside of the container, if necessary, by wiping with absorbent material. Do not remove over?ow that occurs subsequent to the ?rst wiping after attainment of the desired temperature (Note 3). Immediately weigh the ?lled container to the nearest 0.001 % of its weight (Note 4). Record this weight, N, in grams.
NOTE 3—Handling the container with bare hands will increase the temperature and cause more over?ow from the over?ow ori?ce, and will also leave ?ngerprints; hence, handling only with tongs and with hands protected by clean, dry, absorbent material is recommended. NOTE 4—Immediate and rapid weighing of the ?lled container is recommended here to minimize loss of weight due to evaporation of the water through ori?ces, and from over?ow subsequent to the ?rst wiping after attainment of temperature where this over?ow is not retained by a cap.
7.2 Thermometers, graduated in 0.1°C, such as are supplied with glass pycnometers. 7.3 Constant-Temperature Bath, held at 25 6 0.1°C is desirable. 7.4 Laboratory Analytical Balance.
NOTE 2—The usual weight-per-gallon cup and similar specialized pycnometers may have ?lled weights that exceed the capacity of the usual laboratory analytical balance. In such cases, use of a hanging pan, triple-beam balance, with scales graduated to 0.01 g has been found to provide results the mean of which was consistent with the overall precision and accuracy of the method.
8.1.5 Calculate the container volume as follows:
V 5 ~N 2 M!/r (1)
7.5 Desiccator and Desiccated Balance, or a room of reasonably constant temperature and humidity are desirable. 8. Calibration of Cup or Pycnometer 8.1 Determine the volume of the container at the speci?ed temperature by employing the following steps: 8.1.1 Clean and dry the container and bring it to constant weight. Chromic acid (see 184.108.40.206) or other effective glass cleaner and nonresidual solvents may be used with glass containers and solvents with metal containers. For maximum accuracy, continue rinsing, drying, and weighing until the difference between two successive weighings does not exceed
where: V = N = M = r =
volume of container, mL, weight of container and water, g (8.1.4), weight of dry container, g (8.1.1), and absolute density of water at speci?ed temperature, g/mL (see Table 1). 8.1.6 Obtain the mean of at least three determinations.
9. Procedure 9.1 Repeat the steps in Section 8, substituting the sample for the reagent water and a suitable nonresidual solvent for the acetone or alcohol (see Note 5). Record the weight of the ?lled container, W, and the weight of the empty container, w, in grams.
NOTE 5—Trapping of paint or ink liquids in ground glass or metal joints is likely to result in high values of density that appear to increase with the
2 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Thu Aug 31 22:21:04 EDT 2006 Reproduction authorized per License Agreement with Peter L Ferguson (Fast Track Site Services);
D 1475 – 98 (2003)
viscosity and density of the material; such errors should be minimized by ?rm seating of the joints. NOTE 6—Trapping of air bubbles results in low values for density. The tendency to trap air increases with increasing viscosity. Specimens should not be tested if they contain bubbles or foam. Slow stirring, standing, or the application of a vacuum may remove bubbles. If these do not work, a dilution may be necessary (see Appendix X1).
9.2 Calculate the density in grams per millilitre as follows:
Dm 5 ~W 2 w!/V (2)
where: Dm = density, g/mL. 9.3 Calculate the density in pounds per gallon as follows:
D 5 ~W 2 w!K/V (3)
where: D = density, lb/gal, K = 8.3454 (Note 7), and V = volume of container, mL (see 8.1.6).
NOTE 7—The factor K, 8.3454, is calculated from volume-weight relationship as follows:
8.345404 = [(2.54)3A 3 (231.00)B]/(453.59237)C
(2.54)3 is the conversion factor for millilitres to cubic inches. 231.00 is the conversion factor for cubic inches to gallons. C 453.59237 is the conversion factor for grams to pounds.
10. Report 10.1 In reporting the density, state the test temperature to the nearest 0.1°C, the units, and the value calculated to three places (for example, D = x.xxx lb/gal at 25°C); state the mean, the range, and the number of replicate determinations. 11. Precision and Bias 11.1 Paints—The precision estimates are based on an interlaboratory study in which one operator in each of six different laboratories analyzed in duplicate on two different days ?ve samples of paint ranging in density from 8.5 to 12.5 lb/gal. The results were analyzed statistically in accordance with Practice E 180. The within-laboratory coefficient of variation was found to be 0.20 % relative with 25 df and the between-laboratory
coefficient of variation was 0.61 % relative with 20 df. Based on these coefficients, the following criteria should be used for judging the acceptability of results at the 95 % con?dence level: 11.1.1 Repeatability—Two results, each the mean of duplicate determinations, obtained by the same operator on different days should be considered suspect if they differ by more than 0.6 % relative. 11.1.2 Reproducibility—Two results, each the mean of duplicate determinations, obtained by operators in different laboratories should be considered suspect if they differ by more than 1.8 % relative. 11.2 Inks—A separate interlaboratory study of this test method was carried out for inks. In this study, one operator in each of seven laboratories made three determinations on four different paste ink samples. Paste inks were chosen because their viscosities are high and they would be expected to provide a difficult test for the method. The inks represented a density range of 8.4 to 8.9 lb/gal and exhibited viscosities ranging from a very soft news black to a relatively heavy sheet-fed offset ink. The results were analyzed statistically in accordance with Practice E 691. The within-laboratory standard deviation was 0.030 lb/gal and the pooled laboratory standard deviation was 0.045 lb/gal. Based on these values, the following criteria should be used for judging the acceptability of results at the 95 % con?dence level: 11.2.1 Repeatability—Two results obtained by the same operator should be considered suspect if they differ by more than 0.084 lb/gal (1 %). 11.2.2 Reproducibility—Two results obtained by operators in different laboratories should be considered suspect if they differ by more than 0.125 lb/gal (1.5 %). 11.3 Bias (Paint and Inks)—Since there is no accepted reference material, bias cannot be determined. 12. Keywords 12.1 density; pycnometer; weight per gallon; weight per gallon cup
(Nonmandatory Information) X1. DILUTING OF A MATERIAL TO IMPROVE AIR RELEASE
X1.1 To reduce viscosity and improve air release, a known weight of a material that traps air may be diluted with a known weight of a solvent or another diluent of known density. After careful blending to achieve homogeneity and release air, the density of the diluted material is measured by the technique described in this test method. The following equation may be used to calculate the density of the original material:
Wo Do 5 W 1 W Wd o d Dd1 2 D d2 (X1.1)
where: Do = Dd1 = Dd2 = Wo = Wd =
density of original material, density diluted measured in test, density diluent, original weight, and diluent weight.
3 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Thu Aug 31 22:21:04 EDT 2006 Reproduction authorized per License Agreement with Peter L Ferguson (Fast Track Site Services);
D 1475 – 98 (2003)
X2. CENTRIFUGING OF MATERIAL TO REMOVE EXCESS AIR
X2.1 To reduce the variation in the density method, air is removed from the specimen by centrifuging the material, resulting in greater homogeneity between replicates. This greatly improves reproducibility and repeatability and results in slightly higher density readings. X2.2 Apparatus X2.2.1 Centrifuge, capable of a maximum of 4000 r/min3, X2.2.2 Standard Density Cup, X2.2.3 Thermometer. X2.3 Procedure X2.3.1 Fill the centrifuge tube to the top (approximately 150 % of the density cup volume), adjust to the recommended temperature of 25°C 6 1. Place the tube in the centrifuge.
X2.3.2 Turn on the centrifuge and set the speed control to 2/3 power to attain a speed of 2700 to 3000 r/min. X2.3.3 Continue to run for 15 to 20 s, stop the centrifuge, applying the brake as needed. X2.3.4 Pour off the top foam layer. X2.3.5 Transfer the specimen to a calibrated density cup and follow the procedure under Section 9. X2.4 Precision and Bias An interlaboratory study in one company showed that the centrifuge procedure resulted in a 2-fold improvement in repeatability and reproducibility, as well as better accuracy. X2.4.1 Repeatability—Two results obtained by the same operator should be considered suspect if they differ by more than 0.0054 g/mL (0.045 lb/gal). X2.4.2 Reproducibility—Two results obtained by operators in different laboratories should be considered suspect if they differ by more than 0.0080 g/L (0.067 lb/gal).
The centrifuge used in this study was a Dynac II.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility. This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every ?ve years and if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below. This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or email@example.com (e-mail); or through the ASTM website (www.astm.org).
4 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Thu Aug 31 22:21:04 EDT 2006 Reproduction authorized per License Agreement with Peter L Ferguson (Fast Track Site Services);